Is satire still possible in this world of hair-trigger sensibilities where death threats abound as a response to freedom of expression?
by Mary Foran
Irreverance is the essence of intellectual freedom, and Charlie Hebdo, a French satirical magazine, was recently attacked by Islamic terrorists who killed ten of their editorial staff and two police members in a Jihadist fury over what they saw as the ridiculization of Islam and the Prophet Muhammad. The terrorists were caught by French police and killed in a gunfight, but the question remains: is satire still possible in this world of hair-trigger sensibilities where death threats abound as a response to freedom of expression?President Obama expressed his Administration’s support for the Paris magazine’s staff, who vowed to continue publication in spite of the very real threats they continually receive from radical Islamists. Rallies were held in many world capitals in support of the satirical magazine’s staff, including Madrid, in defense of journalists everywhere and the right to free expression.
In a politically correct atmosphere in which everyone fears stepping on someone or other’s toes, it might be a good idea to review just what constitutes satire and how it is defined. We look to the simplest explanation in Wikipedia:
Satire is defined as a “genre of literature, and sometimes graphic and performing arts, in which vices, follies, abuses and shortcomings are held up to ridicule, ideally with the intent of shaming individuals, corporations, governments or society itself, into improvement.” Irony, caricature, parody and scorn also come into it. Satire is a technique employed by writers and artists to expose and criticize foolishness and corruption of an individual or a society by using humor, irony, or by mocking something or someone.
In a free world, the writer or artist can use his or her discretion as to who or what to mock without fatal consequences. Salman Rushdie had to go into hiding for his “Satanic Verses”and Sony was hacked by North Korea to prevent them from releasing the comedy called “The Interview” about the assasination of the North Korean leader.
As a writer, I am not prone to satire, but I support journalists and writers who are, in the name of intellectual freedom. The audience is the barometer of what is done in good taste, and will decide what is acceptable or not. Balance is what I strive for, and sincerity above all. No editor should be afraid for his or her life when he or she is just doing the job of guiding a publication to its fulfillment. We stand with Paris on this principle, and the Pope who asked for prayers to sway the terrorists hearts away from destruction and violence.
The Eiffel Tower went dark in mourning for the victims of this act of terrorism, and the world prayed for an end to the horror of Islamic revenge.
Featured image: “Je suis Charlie,” slogan that became an endorsement of freedom of speech and press. Proof by Joachim Roncin, from Joachim’s tweet: https://twitter.com/joachimroncin/status/552950297405161473
License: Joachim Roncin’s tweet (WebCite)
Jean Cabu by Georges Seguin (Okki): http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Okki . CC By-SA 3.0
Oval Office meeting: (White House official photo by Amanda Lucidon
Charlie Hebdo November 2011 cover uploaded by DASHBot: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DASHBot. Fair use
Texts, prints, photos and other illustrative materials depicted in GUIDEPOST have been either contributed by the authors of each published work or, to the Magazine’s good-faith knowledge, are in the public domain or otherwise benefit from the allowances of Articles 9(2), 10, 10(bis), and applicable others of the Berne Convention for the Protection of literary and artistic works.